Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises
Year:
2009
Journal/Publisher Name:
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci
Volume/Issue #:
66
Page #s:
72-82 Publisher Address:
NRC Research Press
Contact information:
julia.carlstrom@aquabiota.se
AquaBiota Water Research AB, Svante Arrhenius
vag 21A, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
| Location | Fishing gear | Reduction technique | Bycatch species | Effect on bycatch species | Catch | Effect on target catch | Type |
| Baltic | Gillnets | Acoustic pingers | Small Cetaceans (maximum length < 7.5 meters) | Pinger sound signficiantly reduced median echolocation encounter rate by 50% to 100% at porpoise click train detectors placed 500 m away. Reduced sighting rate up to 375 m from simulated net. The average distance of approach increased by 300 m. The return time was 6 hrs. when pingers were silent after being active for 24 hrs. and 50 min., compared to 2.5 hrs after pingers had been silent. | None reported | None reported | In the wild |
