Skip to main content
Home

 

Register/Add a study

Menu

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search The Database

Search The Database

Search Database Menu

  • View All Articles
  • Techniques Glossary
  • Fishing Gear Types
  • Add a Study
Displaying 581 - 588 of 588
Location Gear Catch Technique Bycatch species Type Results

Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada

Trawls
Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis)
Excluder devices
Elasmobranchs Field study in the wild
Summary:

Large escape openings located at the sorting grid panel, which could be a beneficial tool to reduce marine megafauna bycatch, such as Greenland shark, did not impact northern shrimp catch rates in comparison to traditional gear. 

Effect on Bycatch: Unknown. No Greenland sharks were observed during the study.
Reference:
Andrade, S.M.V., Bayse, S.M., Snook, M., Kelly, D., Winger, P.D., DeLouche, H., Araya-Schmidt, T., and M.R. Santos, 2025 , Effectiveness of northern shrimp trawls designed to reduce megafauna bycatch

Pacific Ocean

Surrounding nets
skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus)
Excluder devices
Skates/Rays Field study in the wild
Summary:

A mobuilid sorting grid placed over the hopper used to sort bycatch on tuna purse seine vessels aided in the release of larger mobuilid rays without increasing handling time.  

Effect on Bycatch: Of the 21 individuals released during the study, use of sorting grid allowed fishers to release larger mobuilids without increasing handling time.
Reference:
Cronin, M.R., Murua, J., Croll, D.A., Hutchinson, M., Lezama-Ochoa, N., Lopez, J., Murua, H., Palacios, M.D., Restrepo, V., Stewart, J.D., Swimmer, Y., Zilliacus, K.M., and G. Moreno, 2025 , Evidence for a fisher-designed solution to manta and devil ray bycatch in tuna fisheries

Falkland Islands

Trawls
Patagonian squid (Doryteuthis gahi)
Excluder devices
Pinnipeds Field study in the wild
Summary:

Seal exclusion devices (SEDs) are effective in reducing pinniped bycatch in the Patagonian squid fishery, however, drowning may still occur during trawl hauling. 

Effect on Bycatch: 0.91% of seals over 12 fishing seasons were caught in trawls with SEDs, with a survival rate of 89.5%. SED mortalities were attributed to drowning from blockages in the SED or entanglement in the trawl. Faster hauling speeds may also increase bycatch.
Reference:
Iriarte, V. and A. Winter , 2025 , Disentangling pinniped incidental mortality in a bottom-trawl fishery with seal exclusion devices

English Channel

Hooks-and-Lines
None. Trials were conducted with a tourism operator.
Electromagnetic deterrents
Field study in the wild
Summary:

Use of ferrite magnets did not act as a deterrent for blue shark (Prionace glauca) bait strikes. Time to strike, number of prior interactions, number of sharks present, and number of people in the water also did not influence bait strikes. 

Effect on Bycatch: Bait strike choices were not affected by prior interactions or other variables, such as number of sharks in the water.
Reference:
Lucas, S., Araujo, G., Bown, R.M.K., Johns, M., Matthews, S., Nicol, E., Parton, K.J., Rees, R., Scotts, G., Walker, V., Williams E., and P. Berggren, 2025 , Ferrite magnets do not deter blue sharks (Prionace glauca) from bait strikes in behavioral trials

Field study in the wild
Summary:

An analysis of records of static net bycatch sampling in the United Kingdom from 1996-2023 found that use of acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) reduced harbor porpoises bycatch per haul (BpH) to 0.23 of the background rate. BpH increased for harbor seals and grey seals (Phoca vitulina and Halichoerus gryphus) when ADDs were used. Current efforts to reduce harbor porpoise bycatch may be increasing seal mortality in the same fisheries. 

Reference:
Moyes, F., Smout, S., Thomas, L., Kingston, A., and S. Northridge, 2025 , Factors associated with bycatch of marine mammals in United Kingdom static net fisheries

Northern Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi, Louisiana)

Trawls
brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus), white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus)
Excluder devices
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Turtle excluder device (TEDs) with reduced bar spacing may help to reduce bycatch of small sea turtles that can pass through the deflector bars of standard TEDs. A bent bar top opening TED installed at 55°, a bent bar, bottom opening TED installed at 45°, and straight bar, top opening TED installed at 55° were evaluated. None of the TEDs significantly reduced total catch or bycatch. However, the bent bar, bottom opening TED and straight bar, top opening TED both significantly reduced invertebrate (largely jellyfish) catch. 

Effect on Bycatch: Bent bar, bottoming opening TED and straight bar, top opening TED reduced invertebrate bycatch by 56.2% and 28.4% respectively. No impact on sea turtle bycatch.
Reference:
Gearhart, J. , 2025 , 2022 and 2023 Independent Proof of Concept Testing for the Deepwater Horizon Restoration Project: Reducing Juvenile Sea Turtle Bycatch through Development of Reduced Bar Spacing Turtle Excluder Devices

Baja California Sur, Mexico

Gillnets
yellowtail amberjack (Seriola dorsalis)
Visual deterrents
Sea Turtles Field study in the wild
Summary:

Solar powered LED lights flashing at a 10% duty cycle (5Hz, 20 min on, 180 mins off) attached to gillnets resulted in a 63% reduction in predicted mean sea turtle bycatch rates. This falls within the range found in previous studies that looked at static lights (40-90% reduction in bycatch), suggesting sea turtle bycatch can be reduced with less power consumption.  

Effect on Bycatch: 63% reduction in predicted mean sea turtle bycatch rates
Reference:
Senko, J.F., Wang, J., Burgher, K.M., Jenkins, L.D., Lue Sang, C., Bailly, M., Cuevas Amador, J.P., Cuevas Amador, F., Bowden, S., Osmond, M., and J. Blain, 2025 , Harnessing solar energy to reduce sea turtle bycatch

South Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean

Hooks-and-Lines
Southern bluefin tuna (T. maccoyii), albacore tuna (T. alalunga), yellowfin tuna (T. albacares)
Alternative leader design
Seabirds Field study in the wild
Summary:

The study tested the effect of Lumo Leads on seabird bycatch and catch rates in the Korean tuna longline fleet. Lumo Leads (previously called "safe leads") add weight to longlines by threading the line through a channel, rather than crimping to the line. This can reduce flyback speed and improve crew safety. Lumo Leads also provide protection from exposure to lead weights, and contain optional fluorescent dye to provide an alternative to single-use glow sticks or electric lights.  Unweighted branch lines caught more than twice the number of seabirds compared to weighted branch lines, although branch weighting alone was not able to completely reduce bycatch. Adding more weight and placing weights closer to the hook increased branch weighting effectiveness as a bycatch mitigation technique. However, catch rate for albacore tuna on weighted lines was significantly lower than on unweighted lines. Catch rate also decreased as weight of the leads increased. There was no effect of branch weighting on catch rates for southern bluefin tuna or yellowfin tuna. 

Effect on Bycatch: Unweighted branch lines (control) caught more than twice the number of seabirds compared to weighted branch lines
Reference:
Il Lee, S., Kim, Y., P. Rollinson, D.P., Wanless, R.M., Kitakado, T., and D. Nam Kim , 2025 , The experimental trials of line weighting options for reduction of incidental mortality of seabirds in Korean tuna longline vessels

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Current page 59

©2022 Consortium for Wildlife Bycatch Reduction  |  All rights reserved

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What's Bycatch?
    • Species List
  • Database of Publications
    • Bycatch Reduction Techniques Fact Sheets
  • Research Programs
    • Consortium Publications
  • Our Donors and Partners
  • Funding Opportunities
  • Join the Exchange
  • News
  • Events
  • Log in